Moissanite vs Cubic Zirconia

Diamonds have traditionally been the standard choice for jewelry that expresses love and dedication. However, many people may find them unaffordable due to their high price tags.

As a result, researchers were looking for substitute gemstones that can be just as beautiful and durable without being as expensive. In this regard, Moissanite and Cubic Zirconia are seen as the two most viable substitutes. Thus, creating the Moissanite vs Cubic Zirconia debate.

Moissanite, a crystalline material consisting of silicon carbide, has become a lovely substitute for diamonds. This unusual mineral was first detected in meteorites and discovered by Dr. Henri Moissan in the 1890s.

But beginning in the 1990s, the jewelry business figured out how to produce moissanite crystals suitable for jewelry. Since Moissanite's durability and beauty somewhat surpass those of genuine diamonds, even if it lacks the chemical composition of a "real" diamond, it is becoming a more and more popular substitute in the jewelry industry.

Chemically known as zirconium dioxide, cubic zirconia was discovered in the late 1800s and has been a mainstay of the jewelry industry since the 1970s. Cubic zirconia is a brilliant, reasonably priced alternative to diamonds with an attractive likeness at a far lower price. Although cubic zirconia is not a "real" diamond, its low cost makes it a popular option for people on a tight budget.

Choosing the right gemstone for jewelry is crucial. The diamond symbolizes love and affection in the form of an engagement ring or anniversary jewelry. Choosing a gemstone that suits one's tastes, budget, and ethics is vital.

Diamonds symbolize unwavering love and commitment, but moissanite and cubic zirconia are beautiful alternatives that suit different budgets and tastes. So, which stone will win the moissanite vs cubic zirconia debate?

Well, by understanding the qualities and differences of each gemstone, people can make informed decisions when choosing jewelry to honor life's most precious events. And this article will compare the difference between Moissanite and cubic zirconia, among other things.

Below is the comparison between moissanite and cubic zirconia on various aspects like composition, appearance, durability and price.

Composition and Origin: Cubic Zirconia vs Moissanite

Cubic Zirconia (CZ)

Despite zirconium oxide's natural inclination towards monoclinic crystallization, cubic zirconia (CZ) has a crystallographically isometric structure that resembles diamonds.

Stabilizers such as ‘yttrium’ or ‘calcium oxide’ are required for the CZ synthesis to maintain the stability of the cubic structure at room temperature.

Effective diamond modeling is made possible by the patented 1997 skull-melting technology, which allows for fine control of conditions and guarantees the creation of the required crystal structure.

Out of the many differences between Moissanite and Cubic Zirconia, their origin is the difference.
The technique used to manufacture synthetic Zirconium oxide is called the Autocreuset Growth.

Moissanite

The rare mineral Moissanite, composed primarily of silicon carbide (SiC), was first discovered in an Arizona meteorite impact site.

In 1893, chemist Henri Moissan made the discovery. It can be produced artificially, as well as, organically. Its unique characteristics are derived from the crystal structure that silicon and carbon atoms covalently create.

The silicon carbide used to develop synthetic Moissanite is the same material used to create its natural counterpart. It is made by thermally breaking down the preceramic polymer poly(methylsilyne), eliminating the need for a binding matrix like powdered cobalt metal.

Appearance: Cubic Zirconia vs Moissanite

Cubic Zirconia (CZ)

Cubic zirconia is a less expensive substitute for diamonds that share a similar look. Often used in jewelry like engagement rings, it comes in various shapes like oval and round.

Although CZs are usually white, they can also be pink, lavender, green, aqua, champagne, or yellow, with the intensity and consistency of each color being graded.

However, CZ is prone to deterioration and can eventually lose its shine. Even so, Cubic zirconia has a refractive index of about 2.17, marginally less than Moissanite; some people like its less intense brilliance. In terms of appearance moissanite wins the Zirconium vs Moissanite battle.

Compared to Moissanite's increased brilliance, cubic zirconia provides a steady and clear image because it is singularly refractive.

Moissanite

The remarkable fire and brilliance of Moissanite is well known, frequently outperforming that of natural diamonds.

Compared to cubic zirconia, it has better clarity and is more durable. But some people like their shine more subdued, especially in larger jewelry pieces.

Certain lighting conditions can cause a subtle yellow or gray tint on Moissanite. It creates bright bursts of color, sometimes called the "disco-ball" look, with a high refractive index of 2.65 to 2.69 and a dispersion value of 0.104.

Because Moissanite is doubly refractive, its brilliance is greater than that of cubic zirconia, which is why it is a popular choice for jewelry.

Durability and Hardness: Cubic Zirconia vs Moissanite

Cubic Zirconia (CZ)

The diamond substitute cubic zirconia (CZ) has a Mohs scale value of 8.5, which is somewhat softer than synthetic Moissanite’s- 9.25, hence less durability for jewelry.

Even with a lower grade, CZ is still appropriate for jewelry. However, compared to Moissanite and naturally mined diamonds, it scratches easily; thus, maintaining its beauty requires careful attention to detail.

Because of its oil-attracting surface, CZ may get dull over time and require more frequent cleaning. When assessing cubic zirconia vs Moissanite, CZ is more appealing to people looking for durability and cost.

Moissanite

With a Mohs hardness 9.25, Moissanite is the second hardest gemstone after diamonds, promising exceptional durability and scratch resistance.

Because of their durability, jewelry pieces like bracelets, pendants, and rings can be worn daily without chipping, fracturing, or wearing out.

As Moissanite is less porous, it doesn't collect dirt as easily and keeps its shine without constant cleaning.

The composition of silicon carbide (SiC), which gives the crystal diamond-like hardness even in huge sizes and carat weights, is responsible for its extraordinary longevity.

Despite its large size, Moissanite outlasts other stones in strength and resilience because it maintains a fantastic 9.25 Mohs scale rating.

Price and Affordability: Moissanite vs Cubic Zirconia

Cubic Zirconia Cost

Cubic zirconia costs $20 to $30 for a 1-carat stone in rectangular emerald or square princess cuts and is a less expensive option than Moissanite or natural diamonds.

In contrast, the finest clarity and color grades of 1-carat diamonds price from $5000 to $15,000. CZ has become the go-to material for reasonably priced jewelry, with prices between $150 and $200, and it has a diamond-like appearance.

More giant CZ stones are incredibly reasonably priced, which makes them perfect for vintage jewelry without breaking the bank.

Moissanite Cost

A 1-carat moissanite in blue color and VVS clarity may be purchased for around $1000, making it a reasonably priced yet exquisite choice.

Furthermore, elongated-shaped, colorless moissanite stones with VVS clarity start at $1200, enabling more elaborate designs.

Though the ultimate cost depends on the clarity and cut grades, you may purchase both fancy-colored and colorless stones in various shapes and sizes for about $1000.

Depending on the required jewelry piece and personal preference, one may choose between a 5-carat weighted brilliant-cut round stone and a 2-carat radiant-cut moissanite.

There are many choices for Moissanite, an appealing substitute for diamonds in jewelry, such as anniversary pendants, Valentine's Day bracelets, and engagement rings. It offers comparable quality to diamonds at a far lower price.

Hence, Cubic Zirconia wins in the price segment, with a much lower cost for the Moissanite vs Cz debate.

Eco-Friendliness: Cubic Zirconia vs Moissanite

Cubic Zirconia (CZ)

Unlike natural diamonds, cubic zirconia is fully artificial and has no environmental impact. Diamond mining uses plenty of water, lowering water tables and hurting local agriculture. Mining activities also affect the quality of the water & air, endangering the health of the surrounding communities. Hence, selecting cubic zirconia over diamonds provides a low-impact, sustainable substitute.

Moissanite

Moissanite, as a man-made gemstone, offers a sustainable alternative with minimal environmental impact. Its production avoids the need for mining, reducing carbon footprint and preventing ecosystem disruption. In contrast to genuine diamonds, Moissanite is not linked to conflicts or exploitation, as it's ethically created in laboratories, offering a socially responsible choice for conscientious consumers.

Comparisons to Other Gemstones

The hardness of cubic zirconia, which is made up of zirconium dioxide, ranges from 8.25 to 8.50. Yttria-stabilized variants are softer than calcium oxide-stabilized ones. Diamonds have a Mohs hardness of 10, indicating they are created of 99.95% carbon deep under the earth.

Despite having a similar appearance to diamonds, CZ is not as brilliant; instead, it exhibits rainbow dispersions in natural light rather than the white light of diamonds. Because CZs are synthetic, they are usually perfect. Still, diamonds can have defects, which adds to their rarity and fantastic price.

Thanks to advances in manufacturing, Moissanite, which was previously prone to a yellow or green tint, now offers high-quality colorless choices. Diamonds range in color from D to Z; therefore, accurate grading calls for expertise. Because Moissanite has two refractive indices, it has more fire and sparkle than diamonds. Diamonds are the most durable gemstone with a Mohs hardness of 10, but Moissanite is just a little behind.

Read about: Moissanite vs Natural Diamond
Moissanite vs Lab Grown Diamond

Choosing the Right Gemstone for You

Finding the right jewelry requires careful consideration of several things, such as:

Symbolism and Meaning: Align the meaning of the gemstone with your relationship's core values and personal aspirations.
Durability: Choose sturdy stones for everyday wear, such as rubies, sapphires, moissanite and diamonds, using the Mohs scale.
Maintenance: The amount of care required for certain gems varies, thus choose accordingly.
Color Consideration: When selecting colors, consider sentimental significance, birthstones, and skin tone.
Cut Selection: To improve shine, try round, pear, and marquise cuts.
Transparency and Clarity: Harmonize preferences with the characteristics of gemstones; transparency and clarity influence price and attraction.
Carat Weight: Take into account carat weight while keeping price, size, and quality in mind.
Metal Choice: Considering sensitivities and style choices, metal choice influences comfort and appearance.
Responsible Sourcing: Responsible sourcing ensures purchases align with your values.
Budgeting: Establish a reasonable spending plan and look at low-cost options over a broad price range.

Conclusion

In conclusion, selecting jewelry made of diamonds, Moissanite, or cubic zirconia requires knowledge of each material's distinct qualities and personal tastes and values.

Although diamonds have traditionally been linked to love and loyalty, some people may choose to look for alternatives due to their high cost and adverse environmental effects.

With its fantastic durability and brilliance, Moissanite presents a strong alternative that is more reasonably priced and obtained ethically.

Although not as durable and brilliant as Moissanite, cubic zirconia is still a good choice for individuals on a budget. It's critical to thoroughly analyze each gemstone's benefits and drawbacks, considering cost, hardness, look, and environmental friendliness.

People can choose the ideal piece of jewelry that represents their distinct style and beliefs by making an informed choice based on above mentioned factors, guaranteeing its beauty and relevance for years to come.

Check our Top Collections-

FAQ

Q: Is moissanite better than cubic zirconia?

Moissanite is usually better than cubic zirconia because of its increased toughness, brightness, and closer similarity to diamonds. Hence, people generally prefer Moissanite in the Moissanite vs Cubic Zirconia debate.

Q: Does moissanite get cloudy like cubic zirconia?

Regarding retaining clarity between Moissanite vs Cubic Zirconia, Moissanite maintains its clarity and brightness over time, making it less likely to become hazy than cubic zirconia.

Q: What is the best fake diamond between cubic zirconia and moissanite?

Moissanite is sometimes considered the best imitation diamond, with a more realistic appearance and durability than natural diamonds. Even in the case of Moissanite vs Cubic Zirconia, Moissanite is regarded as the better fake.

Q: What is the highest quality fake diamond?

Although the best imitation diamond is a matter of opinion, Moissanite is frequently chosen due to its remarkable brilliance, resilience, and general closeness to natural diamonds.

You may also like

List Coupon

Moissanite vs Cubic Zirconia | Which is Best Fake Diamond ?